Which is true of inducements in research?
A. Like coercion, undue inducement is easy for IRBs to determine.
B. Inducements, like coercion, are always inappropriate, as they violate the ethical principle of respect for persons.
C. Inducements constitute an “undue influence” if they alter a potential subject’s decision-making processes, such that they do not appropriately weigh the risk-benefit relationship of the research.
D. Offering $10 for an hour-long research study constitutes undue inducement.
The correct answer is option C.
Inducements constitute an “undue influence” if they alter a potential subject’s decision-making processes, such that they do not appropriately weigh the risk-benefit relationship of the research.
Undue inducements are propositions that they attract people in such a way that people act unordinary. People are attracted to induce inducement that they are willing to act in such a manner that they wouldn’t have acted usually.
Usually, Inducements are admissible; however, they are undue. It is difficult to establish its limit. Their influence becomes undue if decision making of potential subjects by undermining their capacity to measure the benefits and risks of their participation in research.
Inducements are those offers that people get to do things they would not do otherwise. Pure inducement- pay for parking, advertisement, salaries perks on a job and any activity to encourage participation. Undue inducement is “An offer one could not refuse is essentially coercive (or “undue”).
Undue inducements can be problematic because:
(1) Offers that are too attractive may blind prospective subjects to the risks or impair their ability to exercise proper judgment.
(2) They may prompt subjects to lie or conceal information that, otherwise they would disqualify them from continuing as participants in a research project.
I am a digital marketer, accountant and a passionate writer. I love to talk about the subjects such as religion, humanity and SEO.